BC Advantage - 2019 Issue 1
Quality Still the MIPS Heavyweight in 2019
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article explains the 2019 MIPS Quality category for clinicians and practices, with emphasis on reporting requirements, specialty measure sets, submission options, benchmarks, topped-out measures, data completeness, case minimums, and year-over-year improvement. It is aimed at providers, practice administrators, and coding or reporting staff who need a broad understanding of how Quality scoring works and what operational factors matter when choosing measures and submission pathways.
Why This Topic Matters
The Quality category remains a major driver of MIPS performance, so understanding the 2019 framework helps practices choose measures strategically, prepare submissions appropriately, and anticipate how reporting choices affect scoring.
Article Sections
-
The basics
Introduces the 2019 Quality category within MIPS and outlines the general reporting structure, scoring weight, and performance period. Also notes practice-size related scoring changes and general background resources.
-
Specialty measures
Discusses specialty measure sets published by CMS and highlights the existence of a nephrology-focused set. Covers the general idea of using specialty-specific measures when selecting reporting options.
-
Submission methods
Reviews the available Quality data submission approaches for 2019 and notes changes in submission terminology. Also addresses how reporting types can be combined for credit.
-
Benchmarks are important
Explains the role of measure benchmarks in Quality scoring and describes how benchmark values may vary by submission method. Uses an example measure to illustrate why benchmarks matter when selecting measures.
-
Topped-out measures
Covers the concept of topped-out measures and the implications for Quality scoring. Also discusses broader policy direction around measure retirement and the types of measures CMS is emphasizing.
-
20 case minimums and data completeness
Addresses the relationship among case minimums, data completeness, and Quality scoring. Summarizes the general scoring conditions that affect whether a measure can earn maximum credit.
-
Year-over-year improvement
Describes the availability of improvement points in 2019 for participants reporting in consecutive years. Explains the topic at a high level and points to comparison of prior and current performance.
-
Next steps
Provides a practical checklist for approaching Quality reporting at a high level. Focuses on planning, measure selection, submission strategy, and monitoring progress through the year.
What You Will Learn
- How the 2019 MIPS Quality category fits into overall scoring
- What kinds of specialty measure sets are available through CMS
- Why benchmark and submission method considerations affect measure selection
- How topped-out measures and data completeness influence Quality performance
- What general factors support year-over-year improvement scoring
- How to plan a high-level approach to Quality reporting for the year
Who Should Read This
- Physicians and other clinicians reporting MIPS
- Practice administrators
- Quality reporting staff
- Medical billing and coding professionals supporting MIPS reporting
- Specialty practices, including nephrology groups
Codes Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com