BC Advantage - 2018 Issue 7
QPP 2019 Proposed Rule Promoting Interoperability
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article explains proposed changes to the 2019 QPP/MIPS Promoting Interoperability category and why the revisions matter to clinicians, EHR vendors, and compliance teams. It covers which measures were proposed for removal, retention, or addition, how reporting requirements were being reshaped, and how scoring methodology and performance thresholds were proposed to change. The discussion is aimed at readers trying to understand the broader operational and policy impact of the rule before finalization.
Why This Topic Matters
Promoting Interoperability affects MIPS scoring, reporting workflows, health IT configuration, and patient access initiatives. Understanding the proposed changes helps organizations assess readiness, anticipate operational burden, and evaluate potential effects on performance under the program.
Article Sections
-
A higher performance threshold
Discusses the proposed MIPS performance threshold and exceptional performance threshold, along with the broader payment adjustment context. It frames how the rule could affect clinician scoring and incentives.
-
A smaller set of PI measures
Summarizes the proposed reduction and restructuring of Promoting Interoperability measures, including categories being removed, retained with changes, or added. It also notes the article’s focus on interoperability, patient access, and public health-related reporting.
-
From optional to required
Explains the proposed shift away from clinician choice in measure selection and toward required reporting elements. The section also addresses the limited flexibility left within the category.
-
Harder to score
Describes the proposed change to PI scoring methodology and the expected effect on overall category points. It uses an example to illustrate how the revised structure could alter outcomes.
What You Will Learn
- How the proposed 2019 QPP rule would change the Promoting Interoperability category
- Which broad types of measures were proposed for removal, retention, or addition
- How the proposed reporting structure would differ from prior years
- Why the proposed scoring model could affect overall MIPS results
- What operational areas may be affected by the proposed policy changes
Who Should Read This
- Clinicians participating in MIPS
- Health IT and EHR stakeholders
- Compliance and quality reporting teams
- Coding and reimbursement professionals following QPP policy
- Practice administrators evaluating reporting readiness
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com