decisionhealth Newsletters, Part B News - 2010 Issue 11 (November)
A 6-step guide to see where your practice is leaking the most money
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article explains how medical practices can review revenue cycle data to find where money is being lost across payer behavior, patient balances, and internal process issues. It is aimed at practice managers, billers, and coding/reimbursement staff who want to understand general audit and analysis approaches used to uncover underpayments, missing payments, and claim-processing gaps. The discussion focuses on broad operational categories, reporting methods, and review priorities rather than on specific coding decisions.
Why This Topic Matters
Revenue leakage can affect practices of any size, and the article outlines general ways to locate and measure it so leaders can prioritize corrective action and improve collections.
Article Sections
-
Revenue leak categories
Introduces the major sources of recoverable revenue and groups them into broad operational categories. It frames the types of issues the article will address without going into code-level detail.
-
A six-step review process
Outlines the overall workflow for investigating where money is being lost. The section describes the broad areas of analysis covered in the article.
-
Claims that do not receive a response
Discusses reviewing unpaid claims that may not have been denied or acknowledged. It emphasizes tracking patterns and timing-related concerns.
-
Fee schedules and payment discrepancies
Covers comparing expected payment information with what was actually posted. The section also notes the importance of keeping payer data current.
-
Analyzing reports and payment categories
Explains using practice management reports to compare payment data and separate claims into broader groups for analysis. It focuses on identifying where differences are occurring.
-
Reviewing high-volume services and outsourcing analysis
Describes examining common services for error patterns and considering additional help when the review workload is extensive. It emphasizes prioritizing the most impactful areas of loss.
What You Will Learn
- How practices can categorize common sources of lost revenue
- Why claim status and payment tracking matter in revenue review
- How payment reporting can help reveal discrepancies
- Why separating claims into broader payer groupings can improve analysis
- How to prioritize review of high-volume services
- When a practice may choose to assign the analysis internally or externally
Who Should Read This
- Practice managers
- Medical billers
- Revenue cycle staff
- Coding staff
- Physician group administrators
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com