decisionhealth Newsletters, Part B News - 2013 Issue 7 (July)
Advance preview -- Withstand auditor scrutiny with 7 ways to bolster your E/M documentation
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This premium article discusses common documentation problems seen in evaluation and management (E/M) services and explains why those issues attract attention from Medicare contractors and other auditors. It is aimed at physicians, coders, auditors, and compliance staff who want a clearer understanding of E/M documentation expectations, pre-payment review concerns, and provider education approaches. The article focuses on broad documentation themes, including medical necessity, time-based reporting, and chart review follow-up, without serving as a replacement for the full premium guidance.
Why This Topic Matters
E/M coding continues to draw heightened oversight, so organizations need to understand documentation patterns that may trigger review and how education can support compliant charting. This topic is relevant for reducing audit risk and improving consistency across providers.
Article Sections
-
E/M documentation and audit concerns
Introduces the article’s focus on high-level E/M claim patterns and why payer scrutiny has increased. It frames the documentation and compliance concerns that drive the rest of the discussion.
-
Don’t overdocument
Discusses the risks of excessive copied-forward content and overly broad charting. It emphasizes the importance of documentation that reflects the encounter rather than generic note volume.
-
Don’t underdocument
Covers the need for documentation to be complete and clinically meaningful without relying on vague shorthand. It addresses the balance between relevance and thoroughness.
-
Show your work
Explains the importance of making clinical reasoning visible in the note. It highlights how documentation can demonstrate the work behind the service level.
-
Sicker isn’t always higher
Reviews how patient complexity and apparent severity relate to E/M level selection. It contrasts different patient presentations to illustrate that illness burden alone does not determine level.
-
If you claim for time, claim correctly
Discusses time-based reporting when counseling and coordination of care dominate the encounter. It covers the need for documentation that supports time as the controlling factor.
-
Little things mean a lot
Addresses basic documentation elements that can affect whether a note is accepted in review. It includes practical chart completeness issues such as dating and authentication.
-
Train your M.D.s
Focuses on provider education and feedback as part of compliance improvement. It describes the role of audits, physician teaching, and comparative performance data.
What You Will Learn
- Why high-level E/M claims receive closer auditor attention
- Common documentation problems that can affect E/M support
- How to think about medical necessity in E/M charting
- When time-based reporting becomes relevant
- Why provider education is part of E/M compliance efforts
Who Should Read This
- Physicians
- Medical coders
- Compliance officers
- Auditors
- Practice managers
- Revenue cycle staff
Codes Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com