decisionhealth Newsletters, Part B News - 2005 Issue 3 (March)
Advisory panel wants you to get a raise, but CMS says brace for a cut
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This news article explains a Medicare payment policy dispute involving MedPAC, CMS, and Congress. It is relevant to physicians, medical group managers, radiology stakeholders, and other specialties affected by Medicare Part B payment policy. The article also discusses broad imaging-policy proposals, including oversight of utilization, quality expectations, ownership-related referral concerns, and coding-edit expansion efforts.
Why This Topic Matters
The topic affects Medicare reimbursement expectations and broader imaging policy trends that can influence physician practices, referral patterns, compliance planning, and specialty advocacy efforts.
Article Sections
-
Medicare payment update dispute
This section discusses the general disagreement between MedPAC and CMS over the upcoming Medicare physician payment update and the broader statutory framework behind it.
-
Imaging services under the microscope
This section covers MedPAC’s imaging-related recommendations, including utilization oversight, quality standards, ownership-related referral concerns, and coding-edit expansion. It also notes the response from specialty groups and physician advocates.
What You Will Learn
- The article’s focus on Medicare physician payment policy
- How MedPAC and CMS differ on the upcoming payment update
- Why imaging services are being reviewed more closely
- Which broad policy areas are drawing specialty opposition
- How physician groups are responding to Medicare imaging proposals
Who Should Read This
- Physicians
- Medical practice managers
- Radiology professionals
- Coding and reimbursement staff
- Health policy readers
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com