decisionhealth Newsletters, Part B News - 2005 Issue 4 (April)
Debate over diagnostic imaging and credentialing intensifies
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article covers the growing debate over whether physicians should meet additional credentialing standards before performing or interpreting diagnostic imaging services under Medicare. It focuses on the competing positions of federal policymakers, CMS, MedPAC, radiology and cardiology organizations, and state legislatures, along with broader questions about training, quality oversight, and imaging utilization. The piece is relevant for physicians, radiology and cardiology practices, compliance leaders, and anyone tracking Medicare payment policy and specialty-society advocacy.
Why This Topic Matters
Credentialing policy can affect who may provide imaging services, how Medicare oversight is structured, and how specialty groups compete over access to diagnostic testing work. The article also highlights how federal and state policy discussions may influence practice operations and reimbursement for imaging.
Article Sections
-
Federal debate over imaging credentialing
Overview of the policy discussion involving Congress, CMS, and MedPAC about standards tied to diagnostic imaging services under Medicare.
-
Specialty society positions and utilization concerns
Discussion of the differing viewpoints from radiology and cardiology organizations, including concerns about training, quality oversight, and growth in imaging utilization.
-
State-level credentialing efforts and local resolution attempts
Coverage of state legislative activity and a local example of specialty groups working through a mediated process to address imaging credentialing issues.
What You Will Learn
- How the credentialing debate is framed in relation to Medicare imaging services
- Which organizations are involved in the policy discussion
- Why imaging utilization growth is central to the controversy
- How state and federal approaches to credentialing differ
- What general types of concerns specialty groups raise in the debate
Who Should Read This
- Physicians
- Radiologists
- Cardiologists
- Medical practice administrators
- Compliance and reimbursement professionals
- Health policy analysts
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com