decisionhealth Newsletters, Part B News - 2002 Issue 8 (August)
AMA panel recommends deleting reference to DGs in latest E/M revision effort
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article discusses an AMA Editorial Panel E/M Workgroup recommendation to remove references to the current evaluation and management documentation guidelines and consider expanded code descriptors tied to physician work concepts. It explains the proposal’s place in the CPT Editorial Panel process, the expected timing of further AMA review, and the potential implications for future Medicare consideration. The piece is aimed at medical coders, billing professionals, compliance teams, and physicians who follow E/M policy and CPT development.
Why This Topic Matters
E/M code-level rules affect documentation, reporting, and reimbursement, so proposed changes to the underlying framework can influence how providers and coders prepare for future policy updates. The article helps readers monitor a developing AMA process before any formal adoption or payer action.
What You Will Learn
- How the AMA workgroup is approaching potential changes to E/M code descriptors
- What role the CPT Editorial Panel plays in reviewing the proposal
- How the proposal may proceed through AMA and payer review channels
- Why ongoing E/M policy developments matter for coding and reimbursement stakeholders
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Coding auditors
- Compliance professionals
- Physicians
- Practice managers
- Revenue cycle staff
- Health policy readers
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com