decisionhealth Newsletters, Part B News - 2013 Issue 1 (January)
AMA, others plead against meaningful use stage 3 deadline, push for delay
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article discusses reactions from major medical organizations and health IT experts to the proposed timeline for meaningful use stage 3. It explains why some stakeholders want a delay, how ONC and CMS may respond, and what providers should consider when evaluating EHR vendor readiness and related implementation issues.
Why This Topic Matters
The article is relevant to practices, hospitals, EHR vendors, and healthcare administrators who need to understand policy timing, certification expectations, and operational planning around federal health IT adoption requirements.
Article Sections
-
Meaningful use
Overview of the proposed stage 3 timeline and the stakeholder comments submitted in response to draft federal recommendations.
-
The tipoff: a draft release
Discussion of why the draft release of recommendations may signal possible changes and how different experts view federal flexibility.
-
With delay, everybody wins
Perspective on the potential impact of a delay on providers, vendors, and adoption planning.
-
Advice for providers about vendors
General guidance for providers on evaluating vendor readiness, considering alternative solutions, and gathering peer feedback.
What You Will Learn
- How major medical groups are responding to the proposed meaningful use stage 3 timeline
- What factors are influencing expectations about possible federal policy changes
- What providers are advised to consider when assessing EHR vendor preparedness
- What types of implementation concerns are driving stakeholder comments
Who Should Read This
- Physicians
- Practice managers
- Hospital administrators
- Health IT professionals
- Medical group leaders
- EHR vendors
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com