decisionhealth Newsletters, Part B News - 2015 Issue 4 (April)
Good news for attesters — and maybe for abstainers — in new meaningful use rule
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article covers a proposed update to the meaningful use framework, with emphasis on how the changes could affect attestation timing, measure requirements, and EHR certification readiness. It is aimed at Medicare providers, practice leaders, and vendor-facing administrators who need to assess whether the rule may change their participation plans or implementation timeline. The discussion focuses on the general direction of the proposal and the practical implications for providers and vendors, without giving procedural coding guidance.
Why This Topic Matters
The proposed rule could influence whether providers continue, resume, or prepare for meaningful use attestation, and it may affect vendor certification planning and EHR deployment decisions. Readers need to understand the scope of the proposed relief and its operational impact before making participation choices.
What You Will Learn
- What the proposed meaningful use rule is intended to change
- How attestation timing and measure requirements may be affected
- Why some providers may reconsider participation
- How EHR vendor certification readiness factors into provider decisions
Who Should Read This
- Medicare providers
- Practice managers
- EHR vendors
- Health IT administrators
- Compliance and reimbursement staff
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com