decisionhealth Newsletters, Part B News - 2004 Issue 3 (March)
AMA Review of E/M Services Coding Guidelines
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article discusses the AMA’s ongoing work to revise evaluation and management documentation and coding guidance using specialty-based clinical examples. It covers the role of physician specialty surveys, the involvement of CMS program integrity staff, concerns about auditing and implementation, and how the process could affect documentation practices for E/M services. The piece is intended for physicians, coders, compliance professionals, and others following E/M guideline changes.
Why This Topic Matters
Changes to E/M documentation guidance can affect how physicians document visits, how claims are reviewed, and how coding accuracy is evaluated across specialties. Understanding the status of the AMA/CMS review process helps practices prepare for potential revisions and compliance expectations.
What You Will Learn
- How the AMA is approaching revision of E/M documentation guidelines
- Why specialty clinical examples are being reviewed
- What role CMS involvement may play in implementation
- What concerns have been raised about auditing and claims review
- How survey results may influence the next steps in the guideline process
Who Should Read This
- Physicians
- Medical coders
- Coding compliance staff
- Practice managers
- Healthcare reimbursement professionals
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com