decisionhealth Newsletters, Part B News - 2004 Issue 9 (September)
Poor pilot test results sink E/M clinical examples
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article covers the AMA’s abandoned pilot test for a new evaluation and management documentation methodology, the reported accuracy problems that led to its discontinuation, and the reactions of physician organizations and CMS. It is relevant to coders, auditors, compliance staff, and clinicians interested in E/M documentation policy, medical review, and federal rulemaking tied to the Medicare Modernization Act.
Why This Topic Matters
It highlights a change in the direction of E/M documentation guidance and shows how accuracy, audit protection, and medical review policy shaped the debate among the AMA, specialty societies, ACP, CMS, and physician advisory groups.
Article Sections
-
Pilot test results and AMA decision
Summarizes the AMA’s pilot testing of a new E/M documentation approach and the reported reasons the project was discontinued. The discussion focuses on the overall performance of the pilot and the role of specialty participation.
-
Physician and specialty group reactions
Covers reactions from physicians and specialty organizations to the abandoned documentation approach. It also describes broader concerns about documentation review and audit protection.
-
ACP position on medical review
Describes the American College of Physicians’ perspective on E/M medical review and its interest in streamlining the review process. The section also discusses its interest in analysis of review costs and outcomes.
-
CMS response and next steps
Summarizes CMS comments about ongoing collaboration with the AMA and the federal framework for testing future documentation proposals. It notes the lack of a stated timetable.
What You Will Learn
- Why the AMA ended its pilot test for a new E/M documentation methodology
- How physician groups responded to the discontinuation of the clinical example approach
- What concerns were raised about E/M documentation review and audit issues
- How ACP viewed CMS medical review policy and process changes
- What CMS said about future documentation guideline proposals and pilot testing
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Compliance professionals
- Physician practice managers
- Auditors
- Clinicians involved in documentation
- Health policy analysts
Codes Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com