Note: The following article synopsis was NOT provided by HCPro. It was created by Find-A-Code/innoviHealth.
Article Overview
This article explains how CMS proposed to classify a set of payment models under the Quality Payment Program. It is useful for clinicians, billing and coding professionals, and practice leaders who need a quick way to understand whether specific bundled payment, accountable care, or other value-based models are treated as MIPS APMs or advanced APMs in the proposed rule.
Why This Topic Matters
Understanding proposed APM and advanced APM classification affects how participants are scored and evaluated under MIPS. The article helps readers compare multiple CMS innovation and care coordination models at a glance.
What You Will Learn
Which broad payment models are addressed in the CMS proposed rule
How the article distinguishes MIPS APM status from advanced APM status
Which categories of participation are summarized in the source table
How the proposed Quality Payment Program framework organizes model eligibility