decisionhealth Newsletters, Part B News - 2008 Issue 9 (September)
Ask Part B News
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article answers a reader question about radiology and cardiology fee-splitting arrangements connected to computed tomography angiography readings. It explains the general compliance concerns raised under physician self-referral rules and the Anti-Kickback Statute, and it notes that the topic is relevant to physicians, imaging practices, and compliance professionals reviewing referral-related compensation arrangements.
Why This Topic Matters
It helps readers recognize when imaging-related compensation structures may warrant legal and compliance review, especially when professional services and referrals involve multiple physicians or specialties.
Article Sections
-
Reader Question
The article begins with a compliance question about imaging revenue-sharing arrangements between specialists and how they relate to patient care relationships.
-
Answer
This section addresses general federal fraud-and-abuse concerns, notes the need to evaluate exceptions and agency guidance, and points readers toward further compliance review resources.
-
Contact Information
The closing material provides submission and contact details for future reader questions.
What You Will Learn
- The general compliance issues that can arise from imaging-related fee-sharing arrangements.
- How federal physician self-referral and anti-kickback concerns may be relevant to professional component revenue.
- Why specialty practices may seek formal agency guidance before proceeding with a proposed arrangement.
- Who the article is primarily intended to inform in a practical compliance context.
Who Should Read This
- Physicians
- Radiologists
- Cardiologists
- Medical practice administrators
- Compliance officers
- Coding and reimbursement professionals
Codes Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com