decisionhealth Newsletters, Part B News - 2001 Issue 7 (July)
Carrier medical directors unhappy with E/M clinical examples
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article discusses early concerns surrounding CMS evaluation and management documentation clinical examples and how different stakeholders responded to them. It focuses on criticism from carrier medical directors, specialty societies, and other policy observers about the examples’ usefulness, consistency, and potential role in implementation. The piece is relevant to physicians, coders, compliance staff, and reimbursement professionals tracking E/M documentation policy and Medicare guidance.
Why This Topic Matters
Changes to evaluation and management documentation guidance can affect physician documentation practices, audit expectations, and coding workflows across specialties. Understanding the concerns raised by Medicare contractors and specialty groups helps readers gauge implementation issues and policy uncertainty before broader adoption.
Article Sections
-
Carrier medical directors say examples are flawed
This section summarizes the concerns raised by Noridian medical directors after reviewing selected specialty examples. It addresses broad objections about the examples’ completeness, comparability, and clarity.
-
Questions about how the examples will be used
This section covers uncertainty about the role of the examples in auditing and implementation. It also notes questions about the contractor involved in developing them and the related CMS work product.
-
Additional criticism from a former CMS staffer and specialty groups
This section outlines further skepticism from a regulatory observer and references continued concern from specialty organizations. It also touches on CMS leadership discussions with stakeholder groups.
What You Will Learn
- How carrier medical directors viewed the early E/M clinical examples
- Why stakeholders questioned the examples’ ability to support documentation guidance
- What implementation and oversight concerns were raised about CMS’s process
- How specialty societies and other observers responded to the proposed guidance
Who Should Read This
- Physicians
- Medical coders
- Compliance professionals
- Practice managers
- Reimbursement specialists
- Hospital coding staff
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com