decisionhealth Newsletters, Part B News - 2013 Issue 10 (October)
With E/M denials rising, avoid these 3 coding myths to stay afloat
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article reviews common myths surrounding evaluation and management coding and explains why they matter in the context of rising denial activity reported by CMS. It is aimed at coders, billers, practice managers, and clinicians who work with office/outpatient E/M services and want a clearer understanding of patient status rules, coding levels, and denial management considerations. The discussion draws on industry experts, CMS system changes, and CPT-based guidance, making it relevant to practices trying to reduce avoidable denials and improve coding confidence.
Why This Topic Matters
Misunderstanding E/M fundamentals can affect claim acceptance, reimbursement, and audit exposure. The article helps readers recognize where denial risk may arise and why documentation-driven coding practices are important.
What You Will Learn
- How common misunderstandings can affect E/M coding and denials
- Why patient status can be misunderstood when providers change practices or specialties
- How billing patterns and documentation expectations relate to new and established patient coding
- Why denial trends may prompt closer review without necessarily requiring undercoding
- How audit and appeal awareness supports defensible E/M reporting
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Billing staff
- Practice managers
- Physicians
- Compliance staff
- Revenue cycle professionals
Codes Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com