decisionhealth Newsletters, Coder Pink Sheets - 2008 Issue 3 (March)
Documentation of status crucial to HPI “3 chronics” caveat
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article addresses evaluation and management documentation guidance for the history of present illness, focusing on how chronic conditions are documented and counted under the 1995 and 1997 E/M guidelines. It is intended for coders, auditors, and clinical documentation staff who review office and outpatient encounter notes. The piece also covers the role of ancillary staff and students in documenting parts of the medical record, along with CMS teaching physician documentation expectations and referenced official resources.
Why This Topic Matters
Accurate HPI leveling affects E/M code selection and compliance. Understanding what documentation does and does not support counting chronic conditions helps avoid overcoding, undercoding, and incomplete provider documentation.
What You Will Learn
- How HPI documentation is treated under the 1995 and 1997 E/M documentation guidelines
- Why the documented status of chronic conditions matters for history leveling
- How ancillary staff and students fit into ROS, PFSH, and teaching physician documentation
- Where to find referenced CMS guidance resources
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Coding auditors
- Compliance staff
- Physician documentation educators
- Clinical documentation improvement staff
- Teaching physicians
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com