decisionhealth Newsletters, Part B News - 2003 Issue 10 (October)
Don't restrict who can perform incident-to services, commenters say
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article reviews stakeholder comments on CMS’s proposed 2004 physician fee schedule and the broad mix of payment policy issues raised by professional groups, physicians, and patient commenters. It is useful for readers tracking Medicare physician payment updates, specialty-specific RVU concerns, geographic payment adjustments, and coverage/payment treatment for selected service categories. The article also touches on CMS consideration of incident-to services, tracking codes, and other fee schedule refinements that affect office-based and outpatient services.
Why This Topic Matters
The comments summarized here reflect how CMS policy proposals may affect physician reimbursement, practice operations, and the relative treatment of different service types and specialties under Medicare.
Article Sections
-
Incident-to
Commenters discuss CMS consideration of possible limits affecting who may furnish incident-to outpatient therapy services. The section reflects differing viewpoints from physicians, therapists, and specialty groups.
-
Medicare Economic Index (MEI)
This section summarizes concerns about how CMS uses MEI-related changes in the physician fee schedule calculation. It focuses on comments from specialty societies about broader payment methodology.
-
Radiation oncology
Radiation oncology groups comment on proposed practice expense RVU changes and related payment treatment for selected service codes. The section also notes requests concerning how those services are categorized for payment purposes.
-
Santa Cruz GPCI
Comments here address geographic payment adjustment treatment for a California county and the effect of rural-versus-nonrural classification on physician payment.
-
Impedance cardiography
Cardiology practices and professional groups seek reconsideration of RVU values and practice expense treatment for a diagnostic service. The section centers on payment valuation concerns.
-
Tracking codes
This section covers CMS proposals for national payment rates tied to Category III tracking codes. Commenters raise concerns and arguments about data collection, payment timing, and adoption of new technologies.
-
Audiology and speech-language pathology
Professional associations comment on RVU and payment reconsideration for services commonly billed by audiologists and speech-language pathologists. The section addresses multiple outpatient therapy and evaluation services.
-
Home visits
The article includes comments opposing proposed payment cuts for home visit services. It highlights concerns about the impact on physicians providing care in patients’ homes.
-
Immunization administration
This section addresses comments on proposed practice expense changes for immunization administration services. It notes objections tied to vaccine administration supplies and safety requirements.
-
Practice expense for professional component services
Commenters discuss whether certain practice expenses should be reflected in professional component payments. The section summarizes support for some CMS changes and criticism of others.
What You Will Learn
- What CMS asked commenters to address in connection with the proposed 2004 physician fee schedule
- Which broad Medicare payment policy topics drew comment from physicians and specialty groups
- How different specialties viewed proposed RVU and practice expense changes
- What issues commenters raised about geographic payment adjustments and fee schedule methodology
- How CMS consideration of tracking codes and incident-to services fit into the broader payment discussion
Who Should Read This
- Physician coders
- Medical billers
- Practice managers
- Compliance staff
- Health policy analysts
- Specialty society staff
- Medicare payment professionals
Codes Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com