decisionhealth Newsletters, Coder Pink Sheets - 2006 Issue 7 (July)
EMR not a substitute for good documentation
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article discusses the relationship between electronic medical recordkeeping and documentation quality in physician practices. It explains why compliance consultants view documentation as especially important in EMR environments, how cloned notes and template-driven records can raise audit concerns, and how specialty groups such as pediatrics and family medicine are responding to payer scrutiny and E/M coding changes. The piece is relevant to coders, compliance staff, physicians, and practice managers who want to understand documentation risk in an electronic health record setting.
Why This Topic Matters
It helps readers understand why EMR systems do not replace sound clinical documentation and why payer audits may focus on records generated with templates or copied content. It also provides context for how EMR adoption can influence evaluation and management reporting patterns and payer expectations.
What You Will Learn
- Why documentation remains important in EMR-based workflows
- How template-driven or copied notes can create compliance concerns
- Why payer audits may focus on EMR-generated records
- How specialty groups are responding to changing E/M documentation patterns
- Why higher-level office visit reporting has become a focus in some practices
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Compliance professionals
- Physicians
- Practice managers
- Billing staff
Codes Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com