decisionhealth Newsletters, Part B News - 2006 Issue 12 (December)
‘Episode grouping' better than G codes for PVRP, panel says
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This piece discusses a CMS policy debate over how physician performance should be measured and reported, including the potential replacement of a large PVRP G-code set with an episode-grouping framework. It is relevant to physicians, medical coders, healthcare administrators, and reimbursement/policy professionals who follow quality measurement, pay-for-performance, and claims-based analytics. The article also summarizes comments from CMS and the Practicing Physicians Advisory Council about broader payment and quality initiatives.
Why This Topic Matters
The article is useful for understanding how Medicare-related reporting and performance measurement approaches may affect claims-based data use, physician reporting burden, and future quality programs.
What You Will Learn
- Why CMS is considering alternatives to a physician reporting code set
- How episode grouping is described as a claims-based approach to measuring care
- What the advisory council said about pay-for-performance initiatives
- How the discussion connects quality measurement with utilization and efficiency
Who Should Read This
- Physicians
- Medical coders
- Coding managers
- Healthcare administrators
- Revenue cycle professionals
- Healthcare policy analysts
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com