decisionhealth Newsletters, Part B News - 2006 Issue 9 (September)
Move to ICD-10 by 2010 looms, despite opposition
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article reviews proposed House and Senate health information technology legislation and the industry debate over linking electronic medical records adoption with a required ICD-10 transition. It is relevant to physicians, practice managers, coders, and health IT stakeholders who monitor federal policy, implementation timing, and practice impact.
Why This Topic Matters
The piece explains why federal policy changes around EMRs and ICD-10 mattered to medical practices, including workflow, training, software readiness, and administrative burden. It also places the discussion in the context of competing legislative approaches and broader Medicare-related technology support.
Article Sections
-
How the bills break down
Compares the major elements of two federal health information technology bills and discusses how each relates to EMR adoption and ICD-10 transition timing.
-
Industry reaction
Summarizes reactions from industry representatives and practice-management voices regarding implementation burden, training needs, vendor readiness, and policy concerns.
What You Will Learn
- The general focus of proposed health information technology legislation
- How federal EMR incentives were connected to an ICD-10 transition proposal
- The types of practice-level concerns raised about implementation timing and workload
- How the article frames the policy debate among industry and physician groups
Who Should Read This
- Physicians
- Medical practice managers
- Medical coders
- Health information management professionals
- Health IT vendors
- Policy analysts
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com