decisionhealth Newsletters, Part B News - 2015 Issue 9 (September)
Locum tenens, incident-to not acceptable alternatives to credentialing M.D.s
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This piece examines common credentialing work-arounds discussed in physician billing, including incident-to billing, locum tenens, and related enrollment practices. It explains why these approaches are often problematic across payers and emphasizes the importance of completing credentialing and contract linkage before a provider begins seeing patients. The article is aimed at practice managers, billing staff, and physicians who handle Medicare and private payer enrollment.
Why This Topic Matters
Credentialing delays can affect when a provider can legitimately bill a plan and can create compliance risk if practices rely on informal work-arounds. Understanding payer expectations helps practices reduce claim denials and avoid enrollment-related problems.
Article Sections
-
Question and answer on billing during pending credentialing
The article opens with a billing question about a provider who is not yet credentialed and whether another physician’s billing information can be used in the interim. It frames the issue in terms of payer enrollment and physician billing relationships.
-
Why common work-arounds are risky
This section summarizes expert commentary on incident-to billing, locum tenens, and other temporary billing approaches. It discusses why these arrangements may not be accepted by many payers and why they can create compliance concerns.
-
Credentialing quickly and correctly
The article shifts to general credentialing best practices and administrative preparation for new providers. It emphasizes completing plan enrollment and related administrative steps before the provider begins work.
-
Find out what you need first
This section covers how prior practice relationships and payer history can affect whether a physician is already credentialed or only needs contract linkage. It also notes that requirements can vary by payer and product line.
-
Ask payers about plan products
The article explains that credentialing status may differ across a payer’s various plan types. It encourages practices to verify whether prior approval applies broadly or only to specific products.
-
Have a checklist
This section addresses preparing documentation before contacting a payer for credentialing. It highlights the value of keeping credentialing records organized and complete.
-
Follow up frequently
The final section focuses on monitoring the credentialing process after submission. It advises regular follow-up so practices can confirm the effective date and understand when billing can begin.
What You Will Learn
- How physician credentialing affects the ability to bill a plan
- Why temporary billing work-arounds can be problematic
- What administrative steps are commonly involved in private payer credentialing
- How prior enrollment and plan type can affect provider linking
- Why ongoing follow-up matters during credentialing
Who Should Read This
- Practice managers
- Billing staff
- Physician office administrators
- Physicians
- Revenue cycle professionals
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com