decisionhealth Newsletters, Coder Pink Sheets - 2007 Issue 10 (October)
Metastatic cancer: How to use primary and secondary ICD-9s
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article addresses ICD-9-CM coding for metastatic cancer in a urology context. It focuses on how the source discusses identifying primary versus secondary malignancies, sequencing diagnoses on claims, and selecting between active cancer codes and personal history codes. The content is aimed at coders and clinicians who need to document metastatic disease accurately for billing and recordkeeping.
Why This Topic Matters
Accurate ICD-9 diagnosis selection and sequencing can affect claim acceptance, medical necessity review, and whether metastatic disease is represented correctly in the record.
Article Sections
-
Distinguishing primary and secondary malignancy coding
This section discusses how metastatic cancer is identified in the record and why source wording from the physician matters. It also covers general issues that arise when determining whether a malignancy is primary or secondary.
-
Sequencing diagnoses for metastatic treatment and Zometa billing
This section focuses on claim sequencing in metastatic cancer scenarios, including treatment situations involving bone metastases and related billing considerations. It also addresses how diagnosis order can affect reimbursement for services and drugs.
-
Double meanings for primary and secondary
This section explains the difference between clinical terminology and claim-position terminology when discussing primary and secondary diagnoses. It addresses situations where the site being treated may not match the original source of the cancer.
-
When to use history of ICD-9s
This section covers circumstances in which a prior malignancy is no longer active and a personal history code may be appropriate. It also references general coding guidance from the ICD-9-CM manual and the American Hospital Association.
What You Will Learn
- How metastatic cancer is discussed in ICD-9-CM coding contexts
- How the article frames the distinction between primary and secondary malignancy documentation
- How diagnosis order can matter in claim submission for metastatic disease
- When the article says a history-of cancer code may be considered instead of an active malignancy code
- Why physician documentation is important in cancer coding
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Urology billers
- Physicians
- Revenue cycle staff
Codes Discussed
Code Ranges Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com