decisionhealth Newsletters, Part B News - 2006 Issue 8 (August)
New reassignment rules proposed - and criticized
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article explains a proposed CMS policy update tied to the 2007 physician fee schedule and why it drew criticism from health care attorneys. It focuses on broad changes involving diagnostic test reassignment and a Stark-related building definition, with discussion centered on how the proposal is intended to address certain lab arrangements while potentially affecting other practice models. The piece is relevant to physicians, practice managers, pathology and imaging stakeholders, compliance professionals, and health care attorneys following physician payment policy and self-referral regulations.
Why This Topic Matters
The proposal addresses payment and affiliation structures that can affect how diagnostic services are arranged, billed, and reviewed for compliance. Readers monitoring Medicare policy, Stark-related rules, and diagnostic service contracting would want to understand the scope of the proposed changes and the concerns raised about unintended consequences.
Article Sections
-
Reassignment
Discusses proposed CMS changes related to diagnostic test billing and reassignment arrangements. The section also addresses access to claims information and concerns about how the proposal could affect common service relationships.
-
Centralized building
Summarizes the proposed Stark-related update to the definition of a centralized building and related spacing and staffing considerations. The section places the proposal in the context of CMS efforts to address certain lab arrangements while preserving other office structures.
What You Will Learn
- What CMS proposed to change in the physician fee schedule related to diagnostic test reassignment
- How the article frames the relationship between the proposal and Stark self-referral concepts
- Why attorneys считают the proposal may affect more than the targeted lab arrangements
- What broader compliance and practice-structure concerns the proposal raised
Who Should Read This
- Physicians
- Medical practice managers
- Pathology and laboratory stakeholders
- Imaging providers
- Health care attorneys
- Compliance professionals
- Billing and revenue cycle staff
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com