decisionhealth Newsletters, Part B News - 2018 Issue 10 (October)
Reporting requirements, scoring are most disliked parts of MIPS, survey says
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article reviews survey findings on how medical practices view CMS’s Quality Payment Program, especially the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS). It focuses on broad areas of dissatisfaction such as reporting requirements, scoring, measure availability, and website usability, and is useful for practices, coders, and administrators tracking value-based payment program feedback and compliance burden.
Why This Topic Matters
Understanding provider sentiment toward QPP and MIPS helps practices gauge administrative burden, compare participation challenges, and stay informed about how reporting and scoring components are being received in the field.
Article Sections
-
Benchmark of the Week
A brief framing note introducing the survey topic and the broader context of CMS’s value-based payment transition.
-
Survey findings on QPP and MIPS satisfaction
Summary of MGMA survey results describing practice opinions about the Quality Payment Program and its MIPS track, including general areas of satisfaction and dissatisfaction.
-
Provider satisfaction level of the following elements of the MIPS program
A referenced results section indicating specific MIPS program components evaluated in the survey.
What You Will Learn
- How the article frames provider feedback on the Quality Payment Program
- Which broad MIPS program areas survey respondents found most challenging
- What types of administrative concerns were associated with the survey results
- How the article presents practice sentiment toward reporting and scoring elements
Who Should Read This
- Medical practice managers
- Physician administrators
- Coding and reimbursement professionals
- Quality reporting staff
- Healthcare compliance teams
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com