decisionhealth Newsletters, Part B News - 2009 Issue 9 (September)
3 steps to take when PQRI codes on your claims go missing
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article discusses Physician Quality Reporting Initiative (PQRI) claim reporting, how to review remittance advice for signs that submitted quality data were received, and what to verify when reported data appear to be missing. It is relevant to physicians, billing staff, and coding professionals who manage quality reporting through claims and need to understand the operational follow-up involved in carrier acceptance and claim review.
Why This Topic Matters
Missing quality-reporting data can affect whether a practice receives expected incentive payment, so timely review of claims and remittance information is important for teams responsible for submission accuracy and follow-up.
Article Sections
-
Remittance advice review and PQRI tracking
Introduces the need to monitor remittance advices and track claim-based quality reporting internally. It frames the issue around whether submitted quality data are being received by the carrier.
-
Carrier communication and practice follow-up
Describes the general steps suggested when expected reporting indicators are absent, including internal verification and contacting the payer or contractor. It also notes operational concerns raised by carriers and practices during CMS discussion.
What You Will Learn
- How the article frames the need to monitor claim-based quality reporting
- What broad follow-up actions are discussed when remittance information does not show expected acceptance
- Which operational stakeholders are involved in handling missing quality-reporting data
- Why internal tracking matters when quality data are submitted through claims
Who Should Read This
- Physician practices
- Medical billers
- Coding professionals
- Practice managers
- Quality reporting staff
Codes Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com