decisionhealth Newsletters, Part B News - 2007 Issue 2 (February)
Track quality data by individual, not practice, groups say
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This news article covers advocacy-group concerns about how CMS will handle physician quality-reporting data under the PQRI program. It is relevant to physicians, practice managers, and coding/compliance professionals who follow CMS reporting policy, provider identification, and quality measurement workflows. The article focuses on the administrative and reporting implications of tracking performance by individual clinician versus practice entity, and on how implementation timing may affect those plans.
Why This Topic Matters
How CMS structures quality-reporting analysis affects the usefulness of feedback, the ability of practices to evaluate participation, and the practical administration of bonus-based reporting programs.
What You Will Learn
- How CMS data tracking choices can affect physician quality-reporting analysis
- Why advocacy groups are concerned about practice-level reporting for quality programs
- How provider identification and implementation timing may influence reporting workflows
- What administrative issues can arise when some physicians in a group do not participate in reporting
Who Should Read This
- Physicians
- Practice administrators
- Medical group managers
- Coding and compliance professionals
- Quality reporting staff
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com