decisionhealth Newsletters, Part B News - 2005 Issue 10 (October)
Treating physician must perform HPI, negative responses are useable
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article explains a coding and documentation topic within E/M services: how history of present illness is documented, how negative patient responses may be counted, and what roles treating physicians and ancillary staff may play under the cited guidelines. It is aimed at coders, auditors, compliance staff, and clinicians who document office and other E/M encounters. The discussion also references the 1995 and 1997 documentation guidelines and notes the broader issue of possible future guideline changes.
Why This Topic Matters
Accurate E/M documentation affects record integrity and level-of-service support. Understanding how HPI elements are recognized and who is responsible for documenting them helps reduce audit risk and improve compliance.
Article Sections
-
HPI documentation and negative responses
Introduces the documentation topic and explains that patient responses to HPI questions are part of the encounter history. It focuses on how this type of information is treated under E/M documentation guidance.
-
Ancillary staff and the HPI
Discusses which parts of the history can be gathered by staff other than the treating practitioner and addresses physician responsibility for reviewing the information. It also references CMS commentary and documentation expectations.
-
E/M revisions in the future?
Notes speculation about possible updates to the documentation guidelines and mentions the cited CMS reference source. The section provides context on whether HPI-related guidance may change.
-
Know your HPI elements
Lists the broad elements used in a history of present illness under the cited E/M documentation framework. This section serves as a reference to the component categories.
What You Will Learn
- How HPI documentation is discussed in E/M coding guidance
- What the article says about counting patient responses in the history
- Which encounter history components are associated with physician versus ancillary staff involvement
- How the cited documentation guidelines frame the elements of HPI
- What broader compliance and guideline-update issues are mentioned
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Coding auditors
- Compliance professionals
- Physicians and other clinicians documenting E/M services
- Practice managers
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com