decisionhealth Newsletters, Coder Pink Sheets - 2009 Issue 4 (April)
Type, location of service determines whether split/shared E/M billable
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article covers how the setting of care and the type of encounter affect whether an evaluation and management service can be reported as split/shared or incident-to under Medicare. It is aimed at coders, billers, and compliance staff who need to understand the broad billing framework for office and hospital services, including when certain encounter types are excluded and what documentation concepts are emphasized. The article also points readers to Medicare manual guidance supporting these rules.
Why This Topic Matters
Correctly distinguishing split/shared from incident-to billing affects claim submission, provider reporting, and compliance in both office-based and hospital settings. The guidance is especially relevant when physicians and non-physician practitioners share responsibility for an encounter.
Article Sections
-
Location, location, location
Discusses how the place of service affects whether Medicare incident-to rules or split/shared concepts apply. It contrasts office-based and hospital-based settings at a broad level.
-
What is a split/shared service?
Defines the general concept of a shared evaluation and management encounter involving both a physician and a qualified non-physician practitioner. It outlines the broad requirements described in the article.
-
What is an incident-to service?
Summarizes the article’s overview of incident-to billing in office-based settings. It describes the general relationship between incident-to requirements and split/shared concepts.
-
What about a new problem with an established patient in the office setting?
Addresses how the article treats an established patient who returns with a new issue in the office setting. It explains the billing context discussed for that scenario.
-
Hospital based services
Covers hospital inpatient, outpatient, and emergency department settings for shared evaluation and management services. It also notes the article’s discussion of reporting under physician or practitioner identifiers.
-
Critical care doesn't qualify
Explains that the article distinguishes critical care from other shared evaluation and management services. It summarizes the broad reason this service type is treated differently.
-
Other E/M services that qualify
Lists additional categories of evaluation and management services discussed as eligible in the article. It places those service types within the broader split/shared billing framework.
-
Consultations of any kind do not apply
Identifies service categories the article says are outside the split/shared framework. It also mentions other non-qualifying settings and procedure types at a high level.
-
Official resources
Cites the Medicare manual resources referenced by the article. This section serves as source documentation for the guidance summarized in the piece.
What You Will Learn
- How Medicare distinguishes split/shared and incident-to concepts by setting
- Which broad encounter types are discussed as eligible or ineligible for shared billing
- What documentation and supervision themes the article emphasizes
- Which Medicare source materials are referenced for further guidance
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Billing staff
- Compliance professionals
- Practice managers
- Physician and non-physician practitioner administrators
Codes Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com