decisionhealth Newsletters, Coder Pink Sheets - 2009 Issue 5 (May)
Type, location of service determines whether split/shared, incident-to
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article reviews how Medicare distinguishes split/shared billing from incident-to billing when a physician and a non-physician practitioner both participate in evaluation and management services. It is aimed at coders and billing staff working in urology and other outpatient or hospital-based settings who need a high-level understanding of where the rules differ, which encounter types are included or excluded, and what documentation and setting considerations are involved. The article also points readers to the Medicare Claims Processing Manual as an official reference.
Why This Topic Matters
Correctly distinguishing these service types affects how encounters are reported and billed across office, hospital, observation, and emergency department settings. The article helps clarify when setting, patient status, and provider participation change the applicable billing framework.
Article Sections
-
Location and service type
Introduces how setting and the type of E/M service affect whether different billing approaches are considered. Discusses office-based and hospital-based scenarios at a high level.
-
In the office
Addresses office and non-facility clinic situations, including how patient status and provider participation affect reporting considerations. Includes discussion of established patients and new problems in the office setting.
-
In the hospital
Covers inpatient, outpatient, observation, and emergency department settings and how shared encounters are handled there. Also notes documentation and billing considerations for physician and non-physician practitioner participation.
-
Critical care doesn't qualify
Describes critical care as a special category not treated the same as other shared E/M services. Summarizes the article’s discussion of how critical care is addressed in the Medicare guidance referenced.
-
Other E/M services that qualify
Summarizes additional encounter types that are discussed as fitting within the shared-service framework. Focuses on broad categories of E/M services rather than detailed billing mechanics.
-
Consultations of any kind do not apply
Lists service categories that are excluded from the shared-service discussion. Covers other nonqualifying encounter and care settings at a general level.
-
What is a split/shared service?
Defines the shared-service concept and outlines the general characteristics of a split/shared encounter. Provides an overview of the collaboration and participation elements involved.
-
What is an incident-to service?
Explains the incident-to concept and compares it with the shared-service framework. Summarizes the general requirements described in the article and how office-based services are addressed.
-
Official resource
Identifies the Medicare manual reference cited as the source for the guidance discussed in the article. Serves as the article’s external reference point.
What You Will Learn
- How Medicare distinguishes split/shared and incident-to billing by setting
- Which broad encounter types are discussed as qualifying or nonqualifying
- What general documentation and participation elements are referenced
- Where the article directs readers for official Medicare guidance
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Billing staff
- Practice managers
- Non-physician practitioner billing teams
- Urology office staff
Codes Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com