Use CMS’ 45-day period to dispute inaccuracies for open payments website

Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.

Note:  The following article synopsis was NOT provided by HCPro. It was created by Find-A-Code/innoviHealth.

Article Overview

This article covers the CMS Sunshine Act/Open Payments reporting timeline and the physician review period for disputing inaccurate payment data before it appears on the public website. It is relevant to physicians, teaching hospitals, compliance staff, and practice administrators who need to understand reporting, registration, recordkeeping, and dispute handling under the CMS program. The article also summarizes the roles of manufacturers, GPOs, physician-owned distributorships, and CMS in the submission, review, correction, and posting process.

Why This Topic Matters

Accurate Open Payments data affects public transparency and can impact how patients and others view provider relationships with industry. Practices that prepare in advance are better positioned to identify errors, document discrepancies, and participate in the CMS review window.

Article Sections

  1. Sunshine Act

    Introduces the Open Payments context and the reporting timeline that frames the rest of the article. It explains the general scope of industry payment reporting and public disclosure.

  2. How the disputes work

    Outlines the CMS reporting and review sequence, including the period when reported data becomes available for physician review and the follow-up correction phase. It describes the organizations involved in submitting and revising the information.

  3. How to address incorrect data

    Summarizes broad practice steps for preparing to review reported information and raise concerns about inaccuracies. It covers recordkeeping, voluntary registration, advance review opportunities, and escalating unresolved issues.

What You Will Learn

  • The overall CMS Open Payments timeline and review process
  • How practices can prepare to compare reported data with their own records
  • What broad steps are involved in disputing inaccurate reported information
  • Who participates in the reporting, review, and correction process
  • Why voluntary registration and internal documentation can be helpful

Who Should Read This

  • Physicians
  • Teaching hospitals
  • Medical practice administrators
  • Compliance staff
  • Billing and reimbursement staff
  • Health care attorneys

Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.

Official DecisionHealth® Newsletter Archives includes:

  • Includes over 25,000 articles from:
    • Coder Pink Sheets
    • Part B News
    • Answer Books newsletters
  • Current newsletters added each quarter
  • Timely news and guidance vital for your practice
  • Fully searchable through Find-A-Code's Comprehensive Search
  • Codes mentioned in articles are linked to the Find-A-Code Code Information pages
  • Code Information pages link back to related articles
  • Save yourself tons of research time, find everything in one place!
Access to this feature is available in the following products:
  • DecisionHealth Coding, Billing and Compliance Library

Related Articles

Articles are listed in order of calculated relevance.

demo
request yours today
subscribe
start today
newsletter
free subscription

Thank you for choosing Find-A-Code, please Sign In to remove ads.

Aimee- AI -powered coding assistant - Try it now for Free Would you like Aimee - AI
to help you with this?