decisionhealth Newsletters, Coder Pink Sheets - 2006 Issue 1 (January)
Use subsequent care codes instead of follow-up consults, but correct codes for confirmatory consults depends on payer
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article reviews how consultation-related evaluation and management services were addressed after certain consult code series were deleted, and it compares CPT guidance with Medicare policy. It is intended for coders, billers, auditors, and compliance staff who need to understand the broad categories of follow-up, confirmatory, and second-opinion service coding across care settings. The discussion also references payer-mandated services, Medicare transmittal guidance, and the role of modifier usage in this context.
Why This Topic Matters
Accurate handling of consult-related E/M services affects compliant billing across multiple settings and payers. The article helps readers understand where CPT guidance and Medicare policy align or differ so they can identify the correct code family for the service setting.
Article Sections
-
Overview of deleted consult code series
Introduces the article’s focus on consultation-related evaluation and management services after certain code series were removed. It frames the discussion around subsequent care, confirmatory services, and payer differences.
-
CPT guidance for follow-up and confirmatory consults
Summarizes the CPT direction discussed in the article for post-deletion consult reporting. It also references payer-mandated consultation scenarios and the related modifier context.
-
Medicare guidance and transmittal update
Describes Medicare’s differing approach, including updated manual guidance and examples. It covers how the policy addresses consult requirements, service settings, and alternative E/M categories.
-
Setting-specific coding considerations
Outlines the article’s comparison of inpatient, nursing facility, office, and other outpatient settings. It emphasizes that reporting options vary depending on whether consult requirements are met.
-
Medicare’s view of mandated services
Highlights the article’s discussion of payer-mandated consultation claims and Medicare’s position on related service reporting. It also touches on the broader treatment of second-opinion requests under Medicare policy.
What You Will Learn
- How the article distinguishes consultation-related services after code deletions
- Which general care settings are discussed in the comparison
- How CPT and Medicare are presented as differing in their guidance
- What payer-mandated and second-opinion consult topics are covered
- Why modifier-related policy is relevant in this article
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Billing staff
- Compliance auditors
- Revenue cycle professionals
- Physician practice administrators
Codes Discussed
Code Ranges Discussed
Modifiers Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com