decisionhealth Newsletters, Part B News - 2007 Issue 10 (October)
Who's reviewing the RACs
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article covers CMS oversight of Recovery Audit Contractors (RACs), including how RAC demands are being randomly reviewed, how appeal-related fee retention is affected at different review levels, and how the audit review window and notification timing have raised concerns for physicians. It is relevant to providers, compliance teams, and coding professionals monitoring audit activity, appeals, and the nationwide expansion of the RAC program.
Why This Topic Matters
It helps readers understand how RAC oversight and appeal mechanics may affect physician practices, audit workload, and record-request response time as the program grows beyond its early demonstration states.
Article Sections
-
CMS oversight of RAC activity
Introduces the added layer of review CMS has put in place for RAC demands and identifies the contractor performing that oversight.
-
Appeals, contractor fees, and incentives
Discusses how RAC fee retention relates to appeal outcomes at different levels and why this has drawn scrutiny from providers and stakeholders.
-
Provider workload and response timing
Describes the operational burden on physicians, including multiple record requests, short response windows, and concerns about mail timing.
-
Audit lookback period and program expansion
Summarizes concerns about the age of reviewed claims and the planned expansion of the RAC program beyond the initial states.
What You Will Learn
- How CMS is adding oversight to RAC reviews
- Why RAC appeal outcomes have been controversial
- What operational burdens providers reported from audit requests
- How the RAC review period and program expansion were being discussed
Who Should Read This
- Physicians
- Medical coders
- Compliance staff
- Revenue cycle teams
- Healthcare auditors
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com