HCPro, JustCoding Inpatient - 2015 Issue 17 (May)
Refresh your knowledge of CC/MCCs
May 6th, 2015
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article reviews common clinical conditions that may affect CC/MCC capture in inpatient hospital coding and CDI workflows. It discusses general documentation concepts, the relationship to MS-DRGs, and the kinds of guidance coders and CDI specialists use when evaluating whether an additional diagnosis should be reported. The content is most relevant for hospital coders, CDI professionals, and auditors working with ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM/PCS-era guidance.
Why This Topic Matters
Understanding CC and MCC capture helps coding and CDI teams recognize clinically significant secondary diagnoses that can influence MS-DRG assignment, audit resilience, and quality reporting. The article is useful for organizations trying to align documentation review with inpatient reimbursement and compliance considerations.
Article Sections
-
Overview of CCs, MCCs, and MS-DRGs
Introduces the topic of complication/comorbidity capture and its relationship to inpatient grouping and documentation review. It also frames the discussion within ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM/PCS-era guidance.
-
When to report additional diagnoses
Summarizes general inpatient guidance for identifying additional diagnoses and the kinds of factors that make a condition clinically significant. The section references UHDDS and broad documentation concepts used in hospital coding review.
-
Asthma
Discusses asthma as an example condition that may affect CC capture and how documentation specifics can matter in inpatient records. The section focuses on general review considerations for coders and CDI specialists.
-
Dementia
Reviews forms of dementia as another condition category relevant to CC identification. It addresses how associated clinical findings can influence whether the condition is considered significant for reporting.
-
Heart failure
Covers heart failure as a condition with varying severity and documentation distinctions that may affect inpatient coding review. The section also notes terminology issues discussed in coding guidance.
-
Hemiplegia
Describes hemiplegia as an additional diagnosis topic and explains why careful documentation review may be important. The section also ties the topic to broader quality-reporting considerations.
-
Cerebral edema
Addresses cerebral edema as a condition that may be overlooked in inpatient records and may require documentation review. The section highlights the importance of assessing clinical significance.
-
Decubitus ulcer
Discusses pressure ulcer staging and its relationship to CC/MCC capture in the inpatient setting. The section also references present-on-admission considerations and documentation responsibility.
-
Quadriplegia
Reviews functional quadriplegia and related documentation issues in patients with significant mobility limitations. The section distinguishes this topic from other causes of immobility.
-
Renal failure
Briefly notes renal failure-related documentation review, including a discussion of acute tubular necrosis. The section is presented as another example of a condition that may require careful coding assessment.
What You Will Learn
- How CCs and MCCs relate to inpatient MS-DRG assignment
- What kinds of documentation factors make an additional diagnosis clinically significant
- Which broad condition categories are commonly reviewed for CC/MCC capture
- Why coder and CDI query practice matters for inpatient record clarification
- How CC/MCC capture connects to audit risk and quality reporting
Who Should Read This
- Hospital coders
- Clinical documentation improvement specialists
- Inpatient CDI leaders
- Coding auditors
- Revenue cycle compliance staff
Codes Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com