ED Coding & Reimbursement Alert - 2020 Issue 5
Guidelines: Understand Telehealth by Studying These 3 Scenarios
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article explains how several common telehealth encounter categories are discussed in relation to Medicare and private payer guidance before and during the public health emergency. It is aimed at coding professionals, billers, and clinicians who need a broad understanding of how virtual visits, telephone services, and online digital encounters are framed in the source material, including the organizations and policy documents referenced. The article also highlights the role of place-of-service reporting, timing, and service-origin rules at a high level without replacing the premium guidance.
Why This Topic Matters
Telehealth coding requirements have shifted over time and can differ by payer, so this topic is important for accurate reporting and compliance. Understanding the scope of the article helps readers quickly determine whether they need the full guidance for telemedicine, telephone-based services, and online digital encounters.
Article Sections
-
Scenario 1: Telemedicine via two-way video and audio
Covers a real-time telemedicine encounter and discusses how the article frames Medicare and private payer reporting considerations before and during the public health emergency. The section also references place-of-service concepts, telehealth platforms, and related policy sources.
-
Coding alert 1: Pre-PHE originating site exceptions
Summarizes the article’s discussion of special situations that affected where telehealth services could be furnished under Medicare before the public health emergency. The section focuses on high-level exceptions and affected patient groups.
-
Scenario 2: Telephone service and virtual check-in
Describes a telephone-based patient interaction and contrasts the general categories of reporting discussed for telephone services and brief virtual communication services. The section also notes that the guidance varies by time and practitioner type.
-
Coding alert 2: Service timing and related-visit limitations
Addresses the article’s caution about when certain telecommunication services are not separately reported because of related encounters. The section presents the timing topic at a general level.
-
Pro coding tip: Services by qualified nonphysician health care professionals
Introduces a separate reporting path for communications furnished by qualified nonphysician practitioners. The section explains that the article distinguishes these services from physician or other qualified health care professional reporting.
-
Scenario 3: Online digital evaluation and management
Covers secure digital messaging between an established patient and provider and discusses the article’s broad treatment of online digital assessment and management services. The section also mentions time-based reporting and payer preference considerations.
-
Coding alert 3: Establishment, initiation, and related E/M services
Summarizes the article’s discussion of patient status, who initiates the contact, and how related evaluation and management services affect reporting. The section also references temporary policy changes discussed in the source.
What You Will Learn
- How the article organizes common telehealth encounters into distinct scenarios
- Which broad telehealth service categories are discussed for physician and nonphysician practitioners
- How the article frames Medicare and private payer telehealth guidance across different time periods
- What general policy topics are associated with telehealth reporting, such as place of service and originating site
- Which organizations and federal resources are referenced in connection with telehealth guidance
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Billing staff
- Compliance professionals
- Physicians and other practitioners
- Practice managers
Codes Discussed
Code Ranges Discussed
Modifiers Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com