QUALITY: Medicare Inching Towards Paying Incentives

Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.

Note:  The following article synopsis was NOT provided by AAPC. It was created by Find-A-Code/innoviHealth.

Article Overview

This article explains early Medicare and CMS thinking about pay-for-performance for physicians. It covers broad categories of performance measurement, the role of health information technology, planned demonstration activity, and concerns raised by physicians about privacy and liability. The content is most relevant to readers tracking Medicare quality initiatives, physician payment policy, and implementation issues around electronic health records and reporting programs.

Why This Topic Matters

It helps healthcare leaders, coders, and policy observers understand how Medicare was exploring quality-based payment incentives and what administrative and compliance concerns accompanied those efforts.

Article Sections

  1. Performance measurement and incentive approaches

    Introduces several broad ways Medicare could assess physician performance and tie payment to quality. The section discusses different types of quality metrics and the policy debate around rewarding higher performance.

  2. Integrated Healthcare Association of California program

    Summarizes a California physician bonus program referenced as an example of pay-for-performance activity. It notes the program’s general direction, focus areas, and broader context.

  3. What Can CMS Do To Help?

    Describes CMS efforts to support physician adoption of information technology and quality improvement infrastructure. The section also mentions agency initiatives and demonstrations intended to encourage better care delivery.

  4. Physician concerns and advisory council actions

    Covers concerns raised by physicians about privacy, liability, and participation requirements. It also notes advisory council resolutions directed at federal agencies.

What You Will Learn

  • How Medicare was considering quality-based physician payment concepts
  • What kinds of performance measurement approaches were under discussion
  • How CMS was promoting health information technology adoption
  • What demonstration and advisory processes were mentioned in connection with physician incentives
  • Which compliance concerns physicians raised about participation in quality programs

Who Should Read This

  • Physician practices
  • Medical coders
  • Revenue cycle professionals
  • Health policy analysts
  • Compliance officers
  • Healthcare administrators

Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.

You have ED coding questions, and we deliver money-in-the-bank answers to help you defeat your claim issues and secure optimal reimbursement.

Stay in the know and avoid federal reproach with your subscription to TCI’s ED Coding and Reimbursement Alert.

  • Current newsletters added each month
  • Fully searchable archives - over 2100 articles
  • ALL years/issues back to 1998 organized by year and issue
  • Codes mentioned in articles are linked to Code Information pages
  • Code Information pages link back to related articles

This feature is currently unavailable for online purchase. For more information, please call 801-770-4203 or Contact Us.

Related Articles

Articles are listed in order of calculated relevance.

demo
request yours today
subscribe
start today
newsletter
free subscription

Thank you for choosing Find-A-Code, please Sign In to remove ads.

Aimee- AI -powered coding assistant - Try it now for Free Would you like Aimee - AI
to help you with this?