ED Coding & Reimbursement Alert - 2004 Issue 25
RADIOLOGY: Interventional Radiologists May Be Punished by Stark Crackdown
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article covers a policy dispute involving the Stark II self-referral law, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, and competing positions within the radiology community. It explains why the proposed tightening of imaging-referral exceptions matters to interventional radiologists, diagnostic radiologists, and physicians who both treat patients and order imaging studies. The discussion is relevant to radiology practices, reimbursement/compliance professionals, and readers following federal self-referral policy.
Why This Topic Matters
Changes to self-referral policy can alter how imaging services are ordered, performed, and coordinated in radiology practices. The article highlights a compliance and workflow issue that may affect who can refer for diagnostic imaging and how interventional radiology services are structured.
What You Will Learn
- The policy context surrounding Stark self-referral restrictions
- Why proposed CMS changes are significant for radiology practice structure
- How different radiology specialties may be affected by imaging-referral rules
- The broader compliance and operational concerns raised by the radiology community
Who Should Read This
- Radiologists
- Interventional radiologists
- Radiology practice administrators
- Medical billing and reimbursement professionals
- Healthcare compliance professionals
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com