ED Coding & Reimbursement Alert - 2012 Issue 8
Reader Question: Review Contracts before Directly Billing the Patient
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article addresses a billing compliance question involving durable medical equipment, managed care contracts, and the decision to bill a patient directly versus submitting a claim to an insurer. It is aimed at practices, billing staff, and compliance readers who need a high-level understanding of how payer contracts, Medicare participation status, and private insurer requirements can affect billing workflows. The discussion is framed as general guidance and highlights the need to review contractual obligations and applicable state law before changing billing practices.
Why This Topic Matters
Direct-to-patient billing can create contract, compliance, and reimbursement risk if payer agreements require claims to be submitted first or limit what may be charged. The article helps readers recognize when contract review and legal consultation are necessary before altering billing procedures.
What You Will Learn
- Why managed care contract review matters before changing billing practices
- How Medicare participation status can affect billing approach
- Why private insurer policies and state laws may influence patient billing
- When professional legal review may be appropriate
Who Should Read This
- Medical billers
- Coding and compliance staff
- Practice managers
- Orthopedic office staff
- Durable medical equipment suppliers
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com