ED Coding & Reimbursement Alert - 2016 Issue 29
WPS Medicare Identifies This Major Coding Problem Among ENTs
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This piece discusses a Medicare contractor’s findings on documentation problems in ENT claims and summarizes practical documentation topics relevant to otolaryngology practices. It is aimed at coders, auditors, practice managers, and clinicians who need to understand common documentation vulnerabilities, payer expectations, and general compliance guidance related to medical record quality.
Why This Topic Matters
Documentation issues can affect claim support, audit outcomes, and payment integrity. The article helps readers recognize broad documentation areas that Medicare contractors and other payers review in otolaryngology settings.
Article Sections
-
WPS Medicare CERT findings and documentation concerns
Introduces the payer review context and the general documentation issue observed in otolaryngology claims. The section frames the article around medical record support for services billed to Medicare.
-
Tips for improving medical record documentation
Presents general documentation practices discussed in the article, including record legibility, abbreviation use, and signature handling. The guidance is framed as compliance support for audit readiness.
-
Legibility and translation of notes
Addresses readable documentation and the handling of notes that may need to be transcribed for review. The discussion references payer and Medicare documentation expectations.
-
Abbreviations and glossary management
Covers the use of abbreviations in medical records and the value of maintaining supporting reference materials. The section also discusses documentation clarity for reviewers.
-
Scribes and signature requirements
Explains documentation considerations when a scribe is used during patient encounters. The focus is on record completion and signature practices.
What You Will Learn
- How documentation deficiencies can affect Medicare claim review in otolaryngology settings
- Which general record elements are emphasized in the article as part of compliant documentation
- Why legibility matters in medical records submitted for audit review
- How abbreviations and supporting reference materials are discussed in relation to documentation clarity
- What documentation and signature considerations arise when scribes are involved
Who Should Read This
- Otolaryngology practices
- Medical coders
- Billing staff
- Practice managers
- Compliance professionals
- Physicians and nonphysician clinicians
Codes Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com