E/M Coding Alert - 2013 Issue 2
Reader Question: Don't Be Cavalier About Invoking The Caveat
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article addresses documentation practices under the 1995 evaluation and management documentation guidelines in an emergency department context. It explains the general issue of when a history is considered unobtainable, what kinds of alternate sources may be part of the record, and why the matter matters for audit review and physician documentation habits. The piece is aimed at coders, compliance staff, and clinicians who work with E/M documentation standards.
Why This Topic Matters
Accurate documentation of unobtainable history can affect audit outcomes and support defensible evaluation and management records. Readers who review ED charts or support physician documentation will want to understand the scope of the guidance discussed.
Article Sections
-
Question
Introduces a reader question about audit review of documentation when history cannot be obtained in an emergency department setting. It frames the documentation concern and the record sources being considered.
-
Answer
Summarizes guidance attributed to the 1995 documentation guidelines and discusses the importance of documenting why history was unobtainable and what alternate sources were pursued. It also addresses the practical audit implications of relying on indirect documentation.
What You Will Learn
- The documentation issue raised when a history cannot be obtained directly
- How alternate information sources may factor into record review
- Why explicit physician documentation can matter in audit settings
- How the article frames guidance from the 1995 documentation guidelines
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Compliance professionals
- Emergency department staff
- Physicians
- Documentation specialists
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com