General Surgery Coding Alert - 2008 Issue 42
Carrier Focus: Never Assign E/M Codes Based Solely on the Length of the Documentation, One Carrier Says
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article examines a Medicare payer’s review of evaluation and management billing patterns and highlights common documentation issues identified in post-payment review. It is aimed at coders, compliance staff, and clinicians who work with E/M reporting and Medicare documentation standards. The discussion focuses on broad themes such as service-level selection, documentation content, consult billing review, and provider identification in group practice settings.
Why This Topic Matters
It helps readers understand the types of documentation problems that can lead to E/M claim review findings and why code selection should align with the service documented rather than documentation volume alone.
Article Sections
-
Carrier review of E/M coding trends
Introduces a Medicare carrier review of evaluation and management billing patterns and the context for the reported findings.
-
Documentation content versus volume
Discusses the general issue of selecting service levels based on the substance of the record rather than the amount of documentation present.
-
Know Consult Provider
Covers review findings related to inpatient consult reporting and provider identification issues in group practice documentation.
What You Will Learn
- How a carrier review can highlight common E/M documentation concerns
- Why documentation content is emphasized in evaluating E/M service levels
- What types of consult-related documentation issues were identified in the review
- Why accurate provider identification matters in group practice billing
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Compliance professionals
- Billing staff
- Physicians
- Practice managers
Codes Discussed
Code Ranges Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com