General Surgery Coding Alert - 2011 Issue 18
Compliance: Get to the Bottom of the 'Double Dipping' Debate
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This compliance-focused article examines a long-running documentation question in evaluation and management history coding: how payers and MACs may view the repeated use of the same patient information across different history subcomponents. It is intended for coding professionals, compliance staff, and clinicians who document E/M services. The article summarizes payer guidance, commentary from coding experts, and the practical importance of understanding audit expectations.
Why This Topic Matters
Accurate history documentation affects level-of-service selection and audit defensibility. Understanding payer perspectives on documentation reuse can help practices avoid compliance risk while supporting appropriate coding.
What You Will Learn
- How the article frames the documentation compliance issue commonly called double dipping
- What payer and MAC commentary says about using the same documented information across history subcomponents
- Why coders and clinicians may approach history documentation conservatively for audit purposes
- How payer-by-payer review can affect documentation compliance expectations
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Compliance professionals
- Physicians
- Advanced practice providers
- E/M auditors
- Practice managers
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com