General Surgery Coding Alert - 2011 Issue 44
Documentation: Make Audit-Proof Record Corrections With These 5 Tips
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article covers practical documentation guidance for making corrections, additions, and late entries in patient records. It is aimed at clinicians, medical office staff, auditors, and compliance-minded readers who need a general understanding of how record amendment practices are discussed in the context of quality review, litigation risk, and electronic records.
Why This Topic Matters
Record corrections are a routine documentation issue with compliance and legal implications. Understanding the article helps readers gauge whether it addresses documentation integrity, internal review processes, and electronic record considerations.
Article Sections
-
Rumor and Truth
This section addresses a common misconception about who may make record changes and when such changes may be requested. It frames the topic around documentation review and record integrity.
-
5 Steps To Successful Record Additions
This section outlines general best practices for handling late entries and corrections in medical records. It covers paper and electronic documentation considerations at a high level.
-
1. Cross out, don't black out.
This subsection discusses preserving the readability of original record content when making a correction. It focuses on documentation appearance and traceability.
-
2. Don't forget the title.
This subsection covers clearly identifying an entry as a late entry or correction. It emphasizes labeling within the record.
-
3. Include a date and signature.
This subsection addresses basic attribution elements associated with record amendments. It also notes authorship and documentation of additional participation.
-
4. Don't be stingy.
This subsection describes including the purpose of an entry and noting its source in broad terms. It relates to clarity and audit readiness.
-
5. Consider these issues for computer records.
This subsection discusses electronic record amendment considerations and the relationship between digital records and printed copies. It focuses on preserving the original record content.
What You Will Learn
- How documentation corrections and late entries are generally discussed in medical record review
- Why preserving the original record matters for audit and legal scrutiny
- Common elements included when documenting a correction or addition
- General considerations for paper records versus electronic records
- How internal quality review can prompt documentation clarification
Who Should Read This
- Clinicians
- Medical office staff
- Coders
- Compliance staff
- Auditors
- Practice managers
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com