General Surgery Coding Alert - 2020 Issue 8
Documentation: Take These 3 Tips, Get Your E/M Coding Back on Track
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article is aimed at coders, auditors, and clinicians who work with evaluation and management documentation. It focuses on three recurring areas of concern: electronic health record templates, using code-book and guideline notes effectively, and documentation issues tied to remote patient monitoring and telehealth-related services. The discussion is practical and oriented toward keeping documentation aligned with reporting requirements without relying on premium article details.
Why This Topic Matters
Documentation quality directly affects whether evaluation and management services can be reported appropriately. The article highlights areas where incomplete, contradictory, or overlooked guidance can create compliance and reimbursement risk.
Article Sections
-
Ensure That Templates Aren’t Creating Issues
Discusses how electronic health record templates can complicate outpatient documentation and create conflicts within the record. The section focuses on broad documentation integrity concerns relevant to evaluation and management review.
-
Write in Your Code Book to Remember the Regs
Covers the practice of using code-book notes and introductory guidance to keep track of reporting information. It also touches on comparing general documentation guidance across sources.
-
Don’t Forget Remote Evaluation Services
Reviews remote service documentation as a source of missed or inconsistent reporting, including telehealth and remote patient monitoring topics. The section also addresses the broader impact of payer and state-level coverage considerations.
What You Will Learn
- Why templates can create documentation problems in evaluation and management coding
- How code-book notes and introductory guidance can support coding workflow
- What broad documentation issues can arise with telehealth and remote monitoring services
- How remote service documentation fits into current evaluation and management concerns
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Coding auditors
- Clinical documentation staff
- Physicians
- Practice managers
Codes Discussed
Code Ranges Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com