General Surgery Coding Alert - 2003 Issue 34
History: Those Who Take a Lousy History Are Condemned to Repent It
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article explains practical, non-code-specific advice for obtaining and documenting a patient history in a way that supports accurate clinical recordkeeping and coding review. It is aimed at physicians, coders, billers, and practice staff who want to improve the completeness and clarity of history documentation without confusing it with the physical exam. The discussion covers broad documentation concepts such as patient-reported information, recording responses, avoiding duplicate entries, and using patient forms as part of the workflow.
Why This Topic Matters
Accurate history documentation supports cleaner medical records, fewer coding ambiguities, and less back-and-forth during claim or chart review. Readers who work with documentation quality can use the article as a quick reminder of common history-taking and charting pitfalls.
What You Will Learn
- How history-taking differs from the physical exam in documentation
- Why patient-reported information matters in the review of systems
- The importance of recording answers during the encounter
- How to avoid duplicating information across history elements
- How patient-completed forms can support documentation
Who Should Read This
- Physicians
- Medical coders
- Medical billers
- Practice managers
- Clinical documentation staff
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com