General Surgery Coding Alert - 2005 Issue 22
Rehab: 75-Percent Rule Report May Up Admissions Scrutiny
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article covers a Government Accountability Office report on the Medicare inpatient rehabilitation facility 75-percent rule and the policy discussion around whether CMS should refine qualifying diagnosis criteria, review patient subgroups, and increase oversight of admission decisions. It is relevant to rehabilitation providers, compliance staff, and coding and reimbursement professionals who track facility qualification rules and coverage policy changes.
Why This Topic Matters
Changes to the 75-percent rule can affect which patients and facilities qualify for IRF treatment under Medicare, as well as how closely admissions are reviewed. Readers following rehab compliance and reimbursement policy will want to understand the direction of the recommendations and the potential impact on documentation and facility oversight.
Article Sections
-
Qualifying For IRF Services May Get Tougher
Discusses the GAO’s recommendations and the broader policy debate about refining the criteria used to determine IRF qualification. It also addresses concerns raised by providers and experts about how CMS may respond.
What You Will Learn
- What the GAO report addresses in relation to the IRF 75-percent rule
- How the report may influence CMS oversight of inpatient rehabilitation admissions
- Why providers are concerned about possible refinement of qualifying condition criteria
- What general types of policy questions were raised about patient subgroups and functional status
Who Should Read This
- Rehabilitation facility administrators
- Inpatient rehabilitation compliance staff
- Medical coders and coding auditors
- Medicare reimbursement and policy professionals
- Provider relations and utilization review teams
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com