Outpatient Facility Coding Alert - 2021 Issue 7
Part B Coding Coach: Bolster ED History Documentation With These 10 Tips
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article explains emergency department evaluation and management history documentation from a coding perspective. It focuses on how chief complaint, HPI, ROS, and PMFSH documentation support record completeness, what to watch for in payer review, and why thorough documentation matters for coders, providers, and auditors. The discussion is framed around practical documentation guidance presented in a webinar and references common issues seen in ED chart review.
Why This Topic Matters
Emergency department coders and providers need documentation that supports the reported E/M level and withstands audit review. This article helps readers understand the broad documentation areas that affect history completeness and why those elements are important for accurate claim reporting.
Article Sections
-
Tip 1: Know That E/M Guidelines Might Change in a Few Years
Discusses upcoming and historical E/M guideline changes and the need to prepare documentation practices accordingly.
-
Tip 2: Use Caution When Carrying Over Chief Complaint
Covers the importance of documenting a chief complaint and the risks of relying on copied or incomplete information.
-
Tip 3: Recognize HPI’s Influence on Code Selection
Explores the role of the history of present illness in evaluating the completeness of the record.
-
Tip 4: Know the Eight HPI Elements
Summarizes the standard elements used when reviewing the HPI portion of a note.
-
Tip 5: Understand the Depth of Each HPI Element
Walks through the major HPI element categories and discusses the level of detail expected in documentation.
-
Tip 6: Understand HPI With This Example
Presents an illustrative emergency department scenario used to show how HPI elements may appear in practice.
-
Tip 7: Know What to Do When HPI Isn’t Obtainable
Addresses situations where a complete HPI cannot be obtained and the need to document limiting circumstances.
-
Tip 8: Add More Detail Beyond the Diagnosis in the ROS
Discusses documentation expectations for the review of systems and avoiding overly general entries.
-
Tip 9: Don’t Overuse “All Other Systems Negative”
Reviews cautionary points about broad ROS phrasing and when it may be inappropriate.
-
Tip 10: Watch out for “Not Pertinent” PMFSH
Covers documentation concerns involving past medical, family, and social history language.
-
Tip 11: Choose History Level Based on Lowest Section
Explains that the overall history level depends on the least complete documentation area.
What You Will Learn
- How emergency department history documentation affects E/M level support
- Which general history components are reviewed in ED notes
- What documentation areas commonly create audit risk
- How HPI, ROS, and PMFSH completeness are discussed in coding education
- Why documentation habits may need to adapt to future E/M guideline changes
Who Should Read This
- Emergency department coders
- Medical coding professionals
- Emergency medicine providers
- Compliance staff
- Coding auditors
Codes Discussed
Code Ranges Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com