Part B Insider - 2022 Issue 10
Best Practices: Beware 3 Red Flags When Coding Time
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This premium article explains common risk areas in time-based evaluation and management coding and why accurate documentation matters for audit support. It is aimed at coders, billers, auditors, and clinical practices that work with CPT E/M guidance, time-based leveling, and related documentation standards. The article focuses on broad guidance topics such as qualifying activities, same-day services, shared or split visits, and avoiding inconsistent reporting patterns.
Why This Topic Matters
Time-based E/M coding is widely used, and small documentation inconsistencies can create audit risk or unsupported leveling. Understanding the main problem areas helps practices align recorded time with actual services performed and maintain cleaner coding workflows.
Article Sections
-
Introduction
Introduces the shift toward total time in CPT E/M guidance and frames the common misunderstandings that can affect reporting. It also notes the broader context of updated outpatient and office visit leveling.
-
Understand Which Activities Count Toward Time
Summarizes the general categories of work that may be included in total time under CPT guidance. It also emphasizes documentation expectations and the distinction between personally performed work and tasks handled by clinical staff.
-
Red Flag 1: Coders Round Up Time
Discusses the audit risk created by rounding time upward and describes concerns about patterns that can appear inconsistent across patients. It also touches on shared or split visit considerations.
-
Red Flag 2: No Documentation of Services Outside the Office
Covers the importance of capturing same-day time spent on patient-related work outside the visit itself. It also addresses the need to avoid counting the same time more than once.
-
Red Flag 3: Skewing Reporting of Other Billable Services
Explains the risk of omitting time tied to reportable work or counting billable services in a way that distorts the record. The section also highlights the importance of documenting other reportable work carefully.
-
Takeaway: Be Confident About Time-Based Leveling
Provides a closing overview of why precise time documentation matters during audit review. It reinforces the need to identify anomalies and maintain communication within the practice.
What You Will Learn
- How the article frames time-based evaluation and management coding changes
- Which broad categories of work are discussed as part of total time
- Why rounding, double counting, and incomplete documentation create audit concerns
- How time-based audits evaluate documentation consistency
- Why practices should review patterns in their time reporting
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Billers
- Auditors
- Physician practices
- Clinical documentation staff
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com