Part B Insider - 2014 Issue 11
Key Elements: Avoid 5 Common E/M Errors With These Expert Tips, Part 1
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article is aimed at coders, billers, and clinicians who support evaluation and management (E/M) services. It focuses on common documentation and level-selection problems, explains why accurate records matter, and discusses broad guidance for spotting and preventing frequent E/M reporting errors. The piece is part 1 of a series and includes examples tied to outpatient visit coding and injection services.
Why This Topic Matters
Accurate E/M coding affects compliance, payment integrity, and audit risk. The article helps readers recognize documentation gaps and overstatement patterns that can lead to improper reporting.
Article Sections
-
Error 1: Watch for Incomplete or Insufficient Documentation
Discusses documentation completeness, record support, and how missing or inconsistent notes can affect E/M reporting. Includes general prevention strategies and a related example involving an office encounter and an injection service.
-
Error 2: Spot Frequent Reporting of Highest Codes in a Range
Covers concerns about routinely selecting the top end of a service level range and the importance of documentation support. Also addresses broader oversight concerns, communication with providers, and time-based reporting considerations.
What You Will Learn
- How incomplete documentation can affect E/M reporting
- How to recognize patterns of overly high level selection
- Why documentation must support the service level reported
- When time-based E/M reporting may be considered
- How coders can communicate documentation issues to providers
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Billers
- Practice managers
- Physicians
- Compliance staff
Codes Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com