Part B Insider - 2013 Issue 12
Reader Question: Preexisting vs. New Matters During Global Periods
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This reader question addresses whether an evaluation and management visit during a postoperative global period may be separately reported when the visit concerns conditions seen after radical prostatectomy. It is aimed at coders, billers, and clinicians who document and review postoperative follow-up care, especially in urology. The article discusses the documentation distinction between preexisting conditions and surgery-related complications, and notes that payer policy may affect whether reporting is allowed.
Why This Topic Matters
Correctly distinguishing unrelated follow-up care from surgery-related postoperative issues affects claim submission, compliance, and reimbursement during the global period.
What You Will Learn
- How postoperative global-period visits are evaluated for separate reporting
- Why documentation of condition timing matters in postoperative billing
- How payer policy can influence reporting of postoperative problem-focused visits
- The role of modifier use when an unrelated E/M service occurs during a postoperative period
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Billing staff
- Urology practices
- Physicians and advanced practice providers
- Compliance teams
Codes Discussed
Modifiers Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com