AMA Clinical Examples in Radiology - 2011 Issue 3 (Summer)
Coding Correction
Coding Correction The first paragraph of the Spring 2011 issue of the Clinical Examples in Radiology (page 6), incorrectly listed that "at least two of three possible elements must be performed to qualify to report 93922 or 93923 ." The sentence should have read: To report code 93922 for either an upper or lower extremity evaluation, at least one of the possible three elements must be performed: analysis of bidirectional Doppler waveform recording from one or two levels, analysis of volume plethysmography from one or two levels, and/or analysis of transcutaneous oxygen tension measurement at one or two levels...
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This brief correction notice addresses a wording error in a prior issue of Clinical Examples in Radiology and explains that the topic involves vascular physiologic testing reporting guidance in radiology. It is relevant to coders, auditors, and radiology billing staff who follow changes or corrections in published coding education material.
Why This Topic Matters
Corrections to published coding education can affect how readers interpret reporting requirements and validate documentation for radiology studies. This notice helps users identify that the article is a clarification rather than a broader policy update.
What You Will Learn
- What part of a prior radiology coding publication was corrected
- Which vascular testing reporting topics the correction addresses
- How the notice frames the scope of the clarification article
- Why published coding corrections matter for coding and billing review
Who Should Read This
- Radiology coders
- Billing staff
- Coding auditors
- Revenue cycle professionals
- Clinical documentation staff
Codes Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com
